Decomposition
Decomposition splits a hard task into stages that can each be checked, rather than one prompt that must somehow do everything.
If you cannot measure whether the output is good, you are not engineering anything.
Students decompose complex tasks into stages, use worked examples to set the standard, and score outputs against an explicit scorecard so improvement becomes evidence rather than opinion.
Measurement is what separates prompt engineering from prompt guessing.
Three core ideas, each taught with worked examples and then practised until it feels obvious.
Decomposition splits a hard task into stages that can each be checked, rather than one prompt that must somehow do everything.
Few-shot examples show the model exactly what good looks like, which works better than describing it.
Output evaluation uses a scorecard applied consistently, so you can prove version two beat version one.
Asking a model to work through its reasoning step by step improves accuracy on multi-step problems — an effect strong enough to have its own name: chain-of-thought.
“It looks better, so it is better.” Without scoring against fixed criteria, you are measuring your own mood.
Sessions 9–16 of the 72-session year, at two one-hour sessions per week.
Where this module fits, what you will build, and a hands-on starter that gets everyone curious about decomposition.
Guided teaching on decomposition, worked through together with the teacher.
Independent practice, small challenges and one deliberate mistake to diagnose.
Guided teaching on few-shot examples, building directly on the previous two sessions.
Applied tasks that combine decomposition and few-shot examples in one piece of work.
Output evaluation introduced and practised, completing the toolkit needed for the project.
Guided build session for the module project: Tested prompt system with scorecard.
Finish, test against the checklist, present the work and explain the decisions behind it.
Every module ends with something the student built themselves and can demonstrate. This is the piece that goes into their portfolio and gets explained out loud at the end of session 16.
Score ten outputs from two prompt versions against the same rubric. Then check whether your instinct matched the numbers.
Students finishing Module 2 can:
The vocabulary introduced here, in plain language:
6 quick questions drawn from this module — vocabulary, the project you build, and a myth-or-fact round. Every wrong answer explains itself, so a mistake still teaches you something.
Tell us your child’s class and what they enjoy. We will suggest the closest program fit—no pressure and no upfront payment.